Scie♏ntist from the Wissenschaftler of Münster have analysed the statistics of the German Bundesliga thoroughly and could characterise a football match as a Poisson-Process and like that made football results calculable. The crucial finding of the scientists is that goals in football are a product of coincidence. Goals, however, aren’t a sole game of dice but are influenced by the technical abilities of the players, the so called performance level, of both teams.
In the Bundesliga a typical outcome of match is determined of coincidence by 86%. 14% are no coincidence and distinct a top t💮eam from a potential relegation team.
Stunning: All teams in the Bundesliga have about the⛦ same conversion of chances.
Home teams score more goals on average. Avera🗹ge 1,66 home and 1,20 away goals. There is an overall home advantage but no evidence that in addition to that teams perform especially well at home. Thus, home strength is a myth.
Typically 3 goals are scored in a match. To be preciseꦡ, the number of goals has decreased over time and now amounts to 2,8.
Rather not. 46 % of all wins are based upon a one-g𝓡oal-margin.
No. Only ℱabout 25% of matches result ins draw. By implication 75% of matc🐲hes have a winner!
Yes, but since ☂the middle of the 80s, the number of away wins is constantly getting bigger. While during the 70s distinctively more ♌than 20% of matches resulted ins away win, that figure already amounted to 33% in the season of 2010/2011.
🐭Extraordinary: On the last two ไmatch days about 20% more goals are scored than on average. So: Bet on higher results!
The goal differente of past matches is especially informative for the purpose of predictions. It is significantly more informative than the num🐟ber of points. The expected amount of goals, on the other hand, is quite similar among all teams.
Goalscoring opportunities are a lot more informative for the saꦬke of prognosis. Good teams show a slight🦹ly better conversion.
The market value of a team as determined ꧅before the start of the season is extremely strongly correlated with their actual performance. Rule of thumb: Doubling of the market value = 10 additional points or a goal difference increased by 16 goals.
A season-specific average Performance level of a team does exist. (Performance level = goal difference that a team scores against an averagꦇe opponent)
The coincidence averages out during the course of the season. The longer the season has already progressed, the more reliable goals and oppoꦫrtunities display the performances of teams.
A football match is dominated by effects ofꦡ coincidence. Additionally the performance level of offense and defen🐽se are correlated.
Without effects of coincidence, the difference of goalscoring opportunities would perfectly 🐽predict the performanc🐻e level.
The goal difference is determined by effects of coincide♒🐽nce with 86% (match day) or 29% (season) on average.
Fluctuations of performance levels from match day to match day are, theref🐲ore, not statistically relevant.🤡 The changes of performances levels take place during the summer break and only rare
There are no positive 🉐series. The concept of a “streak“ is, thus, void. Unfortunately this does not apply for negative series - those do exist. As Andi Brehme famously put it: “When you got shit on your foot, you got shit on your foot!“
In the context of statistical preciseness🥂, the conversion of effective goalscoring opportunities is identical for all teams. For that reason the goalscoring opportunities are quite significant for the p𓆏rediction of goals.
The performance of promoted teams is astonishingly well predetermined. Significant deviations from the lower half of the table (goal difference: -13 +/- 8) are, thus, extremely rare𝔍. For that reason a „march through“ is very special.
With the help of the marke♚t value and the effective differente of goalscoring opportunities you can come closer to the perfect prediction 🥀of the second half of the season..
No. In fact only in half of the case♔s the best team wins and becomes German champion at the end of the꧂ season.
No. Statistically, there are no bogey team. T🐟he scientist’s search for bogey teams was negative. Looking at it statistically the effect꧑ is under 10%.
Of course we🦂 know! But it is 🎀enough for today, we will let you know another rime.